The downside of a mutual agreement is that they say, “Not an easy way to test.” What type of risk response is used when a company`s emergency recovery plan (PRD) contains a reciprocal agreement? In the case of reciprocal agreements, it is important to ensure that the companies concerned are probably not affected by the same disaster. For example, businesses in the immediate vicinity may all be affected by the same evacuation arrangement, power outage, telecommunications losses, floods, etc. The correct answer is “mitigation.” A reciprocal agreement whereby two organizations agree to provide responsible disaster data resources is a form of risk reduction. This generally works well when both organizations have similar information processing opportunities. Since the effect of mutual agreements is to have a functional PRD, this is a risk reduction strategy. There are obvious advantages to this type of arrangement. It allows an organization to obtain a disaster-processing site at a very low or no cost, creating an alternative processing site, although a company may have very few financial resources to create a site. If companies have very similar processing requirements, i.e. the same network operating system, the same data disclosure requirements or the same transaction processing procedures, this type of agreement can be workable. Yes, you are right, but that does not mean that they are easy to set up.
Similar organizations introduce security issues. Now you have privileged access to your systems with your competitors. How are you now if your company is able to meet usage requirements? Therefore, extensive testing is needed. As with any engineering problem, there is always a trade-off. There is no free lunch. The fact that a mutual agreement is the cheapest option will probably mean that it will not be easy to implement. A mutual assistance agreement (sometimes called mutual agreement) is an agreement with another company that may have similar computational needs. The other entity may have similar hardware or software configurations or require the same network data communication or Internet access as your organization. A variation of the alternative sites mentioned above is called several alternating centers or sites.
In a multi-center concept, the treatment is distributed among several operational centres, creating a distributed approach to redundancy and sharing of available resources. These different centres can be used in possession and managed by the same organisation (internal sites) or in relation to a type of mutual agreement.